Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobK1ngid9Pxs7g8RFQDH+O1X4yyL+vMQtaV7i6m-Xn0rw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value
Re: VACUUM fails to parse 0 and 1 as boolean value |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 2:56 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes. Thanks for the comment! > Attached is the updated version of the patch. > It adds such common rule. I'm not sure how much value it really has to define opt_boolean_or_string_or_numeric. It saves 1 line of code in each of 3 places, but costs 6 lines of code to have it. Perhaps we could try to unify at a higher level. Like can we merge vac_analyze_option_list with explain_option_list? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: