Re: Path to unreverting "Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION"
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Path to unreverting "Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION" |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobGvRSELZP=E-XvzsRvkyFAG4LFDaVz0sEdP1H99WXUjw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Path to unreverting "Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION" (David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Path to unreverting "Allow planner to use Merge Append to efficiently implement UNION"
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 8:44 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for having a look. I was planning to have the commit message > as per attached. I'd only split the patch for ease of review per > request of Tom. I should have mentioned that here. > > I would adjust the exact wording in the final paragraph as required > depending on what plan materialises. > > This also fixes up the comment stuff that Heikki mentioned. The consensus on pgsql-release was to unrevert this patch and commit the fix now, rather than waiting for the next beta. However, the consensus was also to push the un-revert as a separate commit from the bug fix, rather than together as suggested by Álvaro. Since time is short due to the impending release and it's very late where you are, I've taken care of this. Hope that's OK. Thanks, -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: