Re: Change behavior of (m)xid_age
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Change behavior of (m)xid_age |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobEBRH6MydCeb6Yfx3=VmMRT7shHLU8O1fSdurB-ykPxA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Change behavior of (m)xid_age (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Change behavior of (m)xid_age
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com> wrote: > Currently, xid_age() returns INT_MAX for a permanent xid. The comment in the > function that 'Permanent XIDs are always infinitely old' may be technically > correct, but returning INT_MAX is a useless behavior because it actually > makes it look like that XID is in immediate wraparound danger. I think we > should change it to return either 0, -1, or INT_MIN. To me, 0 makes the most > sense for monitoring relfrozenxid. As far as I know, relfrozenxid is only a permanent XID for relkinds that don't have storage; then it's zero. So I think you should just change your query to ignore pg_class rows where relfrozenxid = 0, and leave xid_age() alone. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: