Re: [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobDRXzLJ_u4pYD4UK=rYjUb_B4brO-5zPRO3fYX8duVNg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [doc fix] Correct calculation of vm.nr_hugepages
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2018 at 03:14:57PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 9:43 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki >> <tsunakawa.takay@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> > Thanks, I'd like to take this. >> >> Why are these values so large? The example in the documentation shows >> 6490428 kB, and in my test I got 8733888 kB. But 8733888 kB = 8.3 TB! >> 8.3 GB would make sense, but 8.3 TB does not. > > pryzbyj@pryzbyj:~$ units -t -v 8733888kB GiB > 8733888kB = 8.1340671 GiB Sigh. It would be nice if I were less stupid. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: