Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmobD6i_wCb0dvkv3vtGkS006RxVTXf27EQBhqeTjCRPq-g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Wait for parallel workers to attach
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:48 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 9:09 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:08 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I think suggesting to use this API to wait "for a specific worker" >>> doesn't seem like a good idea as it doesn't have any such provision. >> >> I see your point, but in the absence of a more specific API it could >> be used that way, and it wouldn't be unreasonable. Just might wait a >> little longer than absolutely necessary. > > Fair enough, you can proceed with the patch. Committed. Now, on to the main event! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: