Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobCu-tQzyqehaQbZmzHsKoMaK2jOrn29+g3DatSXtDogQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and
generate_series(date,date,integer)
Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > One idea that might be worth considering is to define the function > as generate_series(date,date,interval) returns timestamp (without > time zone). The point here would be only to move the behavior for > date inputs as far as getting timestamp without tz rather than > timestamp with tz; which would at least save some timezone rotations > in typical use, as well as rather debatable semantics. (The fact > that timestamptz is the preferred type in this hierarchy isn't > really doing us any favors here.) That's a fairly tenuous benefit, though, and a substantially different patch. I think it's time to give up here and move on. We can revisit this for another release after we've had more time to think about it, if that seems like a smart thing to do when the time comes. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: