Re: [HACKERS] POC: Sharing record typmods between backends
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] POC: Sharing record typmods between backends |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobBiHK9huYxA6ErKwhNiUAMWvWCdxN74fb=2uo=diSOvw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] POC: Sharing record typmods between backends (Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] POC: Sharing record typmods between backends
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 2:45 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:09 AM, Thomas Munro > <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> * Perhaps simplehash + an LWLock would be better than dht, but I >>> haven't looked into that. Can it be convinced to work in DSA memory >>> and to grow on demand? > > Simplehash provides an option to provide your own allocator function > to it. So in the allocator function, you can allocate memory from DSA. > After it reaches some threshold it expands the size (double) and it > will again call the allocator function to allocate the bigger memory. > You can refer pagetable_allocate in tidbitmap.c. That only allows the pagetable to be shared, not the hash table itself. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: