Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobB-igLrjfH+zfmpY00ysAseCBxcRukjyhdneamyebfYA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test
drivers
Re: Set log_line_prefix and application name in test drivers |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> writes: >>> I've always been wondering why we don't set a log_line_prefix by >>> default. >> >> I think the odds of getting to something that everyone would agree on >> are nil, so I'm not excited about getting into that particular >> bikeshed-painting discussion. Look at the amount of trouble we're >> having converging on a default for the regression tests, which are >> a far narrower use-case than "everybody". > > Well, practically anything that includes a PID and the timestamp is > going to be an improvement over the status quo. Just because we can't > all agree on what would be perfect does not mean that we can't do > better than what we've got now. +1 for trying. Is there any chance we can move forward here, or is this effort doomed for now? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: