Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmobA=RLsZfcpcr+Y13DzQApSFz1QuPGPBGMvRAQVrRb4zQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Server-side base backup: why superuser, not pg_write_server_files?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:50 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 1:46 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Well, if someone wants to step up and provide a patch that changes 'em > > all at once, that'd be great. But we've discussed this before and > > nothing's happened. > > I mean, I don't understand why it's even better. And I would go so far > as to say that if nobody can be bothered to do the work to convert > everything at once, it probably isn't better. And one thing that concretely stinks about is the progress reporting you get while the tests are running: t/010_pg_basebackup.pl ... 142/? That's definitely less informative than 142/330 or whatever. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: