Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob=2g_u7uinMHdVxD=GPZBRe7ouG5G=zD096tU5n_qGOw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > Never mind. There was a lot of items especially at the last CommitFest. > >> In terms of moving forward, I'd still like to hear what >> Andres has to say about the comments I made on March 1st. > > Yeah, agreed. $ ping -n andres.freund Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 Request timeout for icmp_seq 3 Request timeout for icmp_seq 4 ^C --- andres.freund ping statistics --- 6 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100.0% packet loss Meanwhile, https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4c171ffe-e3ee-acc5-9066-a40d52bc5ae9@postgrespro.ru shows that this patch has some benefits for other cases, which is a point in favor IMHO. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: