Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob9t=Y=p7ikay3ugdr+qXJ_Y0FiE1reKpaZw2+zzF7AuA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples (Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples
Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 15 November 2012 18:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ah, yeah. I wondered in passing about that but forgot to follow up on >> it. The problem specifically is that the intermediate result >> memtupsize * newmemtuples might overflow. I believe that the old >> memtupsize can never be more than 2^26 bytes, because the allocation >> limit is 1GB and each SortTuple is 16 bytes. > > Do you mean the intermediate result of memtupsize * allowedMem? Yes. > Oh, > yeah, that could overflow rather easily on a platform where long is > only 32-bit. Or even 64-bit, with really large values of work_mem. > We're multiplying the entire current allocation size of > the array by the maximum length. I guess the fact that you didn't spot > it made me overconfident. :-) Ha! So what's next here? Do you want to work on these issue some more? Or does Jeff? I'd like to see this go in, but I'm not sure I have the bandwidth to do the legwork myself. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: