Re: Logging parallel worker draught
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Logging parallel worker draught |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob91fKoE1QoTqGomBTUZT9JcXwFYrPEmm3arapak-WTsA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Logging parallel worker draught (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Logging parallel worker draught
Re: Logging parallel worker draught |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 7:06 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think introducing a GUC for this is a good idea. We can > directly output this message in the server log either at LOG or DEBUG1 > level. Why not? It seems like something some people might want to log and others not. Running the whole server at DEBUG1 to get this information doesn't seem like a suitable answer. What I was wondering was whether we would be better off putting this into the statistics collector, vs. doing it via logging. Both approaches seem to have pros and cons. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: