Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmob6euOYrg0h10EG3yFPMSU=DhiDAepvgD=E1egLOLHfSQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | createuser --memeber and PG 16 (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: createuser --memeber and PG 16
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 1:33 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > This seems like it will be forever confusing to people. I frankly don't > know why --role matching CREATE ROLE ... ROLE IN was not already > confusing in pre-PG 16. Any new ideas for improvement? Yeah, it's a bad situation. I think --role is basically misnamed. Something like --add-to-group would have been clearer, but that also has the problem of being inconsistent with the SQL command. The whole ROLE vs. IN ROLE thing is inherently quite confusing, I think. It's very easy to get confused about which direction the membership arrows are pointing. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: