Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob6XVWPZ-GWs_5vEov5LVq5whtbS-MRHc5ZodoFq8QDQQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence? (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Inverse of pg_get_serial_sequence?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > We have pg_get_serial_sequence() mapping (relation, colum) to the > sequence. What I'm missing right now is the inverse. I.e. given a > sequence tell me the owner. > describe.c has a query for that, and it's not too hard to write, but it > still seems 'unfriendly' not to provide it. > > Does anybody dislike adding a function for that? I'll go out on a limb and say that it sounds like pointless catalog bloat to me. I am all in favor of adding things like this where the SQL query is painful to write (e.g. things involving pg_depend) but if it's a simple SELECT query then, eh, not really excited about it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: