Re: 9.5 release notes
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.5 release notes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob4=3wKbw2Qvx6YvT87w6XCSoGEWqDSkTcAz+OVXZ6-BQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.5 release notes (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.5 release notes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2015-06-11 PM 01:15, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> I have committed the first draft of the 9.5 release notes. You can view >> the output here: >> >> http://momjian.us/pgsql_docs/release-9-5.html >> >> and it will eventually appear here: >> >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release.html >> >> I am ready to make suggested adjustments, though I am traveling for >> conferences for the next ten days so there might a delay in my replies. >> > > Is it intentional that the following items are separate? > > <listitem> > <para> > Move <application>pg_upgrade</> from <filename>contrib</> to > <filename>src/bin</> (Peter Eisentraut) > </para> > </listitem> > > > <listitem> > <para> > Move <application>pg_upgrade_support</> code into backend and > remove the module (Peter Eisentraut) > </para> > </listitem> > > Or could they made into one item? I think one item would be fine. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: