Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob44oaYJFGAZ6qYsrXLJo55bofRdraF7X_7U31NNXqNcw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [BUG] pg_basebackup from disconnected standby fails
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:05 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 7:16 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> This can create problem if the checkpoint record spans across multiple >> segments, because you are updating minRecoveryPoint to start of >> checkpoint record. We need to update it to end+1 of checkpoint >> record. Please find attached patch which takes care of same. > > I gave up counting my mistakes on this thread, thanks. You should > update the comments of XLogCtlData for the new field > lastCheckPointEndPtr so as it is not used by the background writer but > when creating a new restart point to define the minimum recovery > point. I committed and back-patched this with some additional work on the comments, but I don't understand this remark. That comment seems like it should refer to the checkpointer in modern branches, but isn't that point independent of this patch? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: