Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmob3Lndh_9328qFN-hQM2FPcXtzn6qoqsLoXKWPUzcR=zA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE? (Matheus de Oliveira <matioli.matheus@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: How about a proper TEMPORARY TABLESPACE?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Matheus de Oliveira <matioli.matheus@gmail.com> wrote: >> Then, to summarize Matheus must do: >> * use an option instead of change the syntax and catalog to indicate that >> a tablespace is used to store temp objects > > Yes. I myself wasn't sure TEMPORARY syntax would be good, but I would just > like to hear more about. Storing as an options seems nice to me. I kind of like the TEMPORARY syntax, by analogy with what we do for tables. On the other hand, this situation isn't quite analogous: the tablespace itself is permanent; it's only the objects inside the tablespace that are temporary. Hmm. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: