Re: Almost bug in COPY FROM processing of GB18030 encoded input
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Almost bug in COPY FROM processing of GB18030 encoded input |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob3Kq0beYh8Myh5=7SEt4+MKhRig6RumaV3=bYqYQqwFw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Almost bug in COPY FROM processing of GB18030 encoded input (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
Ответы |
Re: Almost bug in COPY FROM processing of GB18030 encoded input
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 6:23 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: > I happened to notice that when CopyReadLineText() calls mblen(), it > passes only the first byte of the multi-byte characters. However, > pg_gb18030_mblen() looks at the first and the second byte. > CopyReadLineText() always passes \0 as the second byte, so > pg_gb18030_mblen() will incorrectly report the length of 4-byte encoded > characters as 2. > > It works out fine, though, because the second half of the 4-byte encoded > character always looks like another 2-byte encoded character, in > GB18030. CopyReadLineText() is looking for delimiter and escape > characters and newlines, and only single-byte characters are supported > for those, so treating a 4-byte character as two 2-byte characters is > harmless. Yikes. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: