Re: [HACKERS] varlena beyond 1GB and matrix

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
> 2016-12-23 8:23 GMT+09:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
>>>> Handling objects >1GB at all seems like the harder part of the
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>> I could get your point almost. Does the last line above mention about
>>> amount of the data object >1GB? even if the "super-varlena" format
>>> allows 64bit length?
>>
>> Sorry, I can't understand your question about what I wrote.
>>
> I thought you just pointed out it is always harder part to treat large
> amount of data even if data format allows >1GB or more. Right?

I *think* we agreeing.  But I'm still not 100% sure.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company