Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob15PhQc6zKEU_=o5oVu-7Y76rhvxsDpJcopGSp4FG6hw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Document ABI Compatibility
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 6:38 PM David E. Wheeler <david@justatheory.com> wrote: > Is it? ISTM that there is the intention not to break things that don’t need to be broken, though that doesn’t rule outinterface improvements. I suppose that it's true that we try to avoid gratuitous breakage, but I feel like it would be weird to document that. Sometimes I go to a store and I see a sign that says "shoplifters will be prosecuted." But I have yet to see a store with a sign that says "people who appear to be doing absolutely nothing wrong will not be prosecuted." If I did see such a sign, I would frankly be a little concerned. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: