Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob0sD3BGo46ZXK4hJw=2NDco10Zsx=rzTMxVXY0kHRvxg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux) (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Postgres, fsync, and OSs (specifically linux)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:44 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2018-05-10 09:50:03 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote: >> while ((src = (RewriteMappingFile *) hash_seq_search(&seq_status)) != NULL) >> { >> if (FileSync(src->vfd, WAIT_EVENT_LOGICAL_REWRITE_SYNC) != 0) >> - ereport(ERROR, >> + ereport(PANIC, >> (errcode_for_file_access(), >> errmsg("could not fsync file \"%s\": %m", src->path))); > > To me this (and the other callers) doesn't quite look right. First, I > think we should probably be a bit more restrictive about when PANIC > out. It seems like we should PANIC on ENOSPC and EIO, but possibly not > others. Secondly, I think we should centralize the error handling. It > seems likely that we'll acrue some platform specific workarounds, and I > don't want to copy that knowledge everywhere. Maybe something like: ereport(promote_eio_to_panic(ERROR), ...) ? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: