Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmob00Lhtnm4O=j0JrKVAZn8Y5KtVqqbTQBQVTuPK0TxKfA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments (Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com> wrote: > Such a thing would help COPY, so maybe it's worth a look I have little doubt that a deferred insertion buffer of some kind could help performance on some workloads, though I suspect the buffer would have to be pretty big to make it worthwhile on a big COPY that generates mostly-random insertions. I think the question is not so much whether it's worth doing but where anyone's going to find the time to do it. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: