Re: [HACKERS] Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 3:10 PM, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 8/24/17 7:36 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> True as well. The patch looks good to me. If a committer does not show
>> up soon, it may be better to register that in the CF and wait. I am
>> not sure that adding an open item is suited, as docs have the same
>> problem on 9.6.
>
> Robert said he would commit this so I expect he'll do that if he doesn't
> have any objections to the changes.
>
> Robert, if you would prefer me to submit this to the CF I'm happy to do so.

Ha, this note arrived just as I was working on getting this committed.
I'll commit this to 11 and 10 presently; can you produce a version for
9.6?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company