Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoas1AbDQPAoE1yE9U7d56j06swZvickKKfoYjUoM3t6UQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit?
Re: Should we increase the default vacuum_cost_limit? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 8:39 AM David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I decided to do the times by 10 option that I had mentioned.... Ensue > debate about that... +1 for raising the default substantially. In my experience, and it seems others are in a similar place, nobody ever gets into trouble because the default is too high, but sometimes people get in trouble because the default is too low. If we raise it enough that a few people have to reduce it and a few people have to further increase it, IMHO that would be about right. Not sure exactly what value would accomplish that goal. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: