Re: CATUPDATE confusion?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CATUPDATE confusion? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoanWZqp0gNhZTmPRT5ceJdscG+-0a7nRZLjiCookJGjwQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CATUPDATE confusion? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: CATUPDATE confusion?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 9:52 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > * Stephen Frost (sfrost@snowman.net) wrote: >> I should have been more specific. I don't believe they've moved to >> using pg_roles completely (which was created specifically to address the >> issue that regular users can't select from pg_authid). > > Err, forgot to finish that thought, sorry. Let's try again: > > I should have been more specific. I don't believe they've moved to > using pg_roles completely (which was created specifically to address the > issue that regular users can't select from pg_authid) simply because > they haven't had reason to. That's another way of saying "removing pg_user would be creating extra work for tool authors that otherwise wouldn't need to be done". -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: