Re: split builtins.h to quote.h
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: split builtins.h to quote.h |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoanBXP50U6b0HJHDw89ksBLqf19qb53RGjWZ1y9UzeFKQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: split builtins.h to quote.h (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas wrote: >> I personally think that's getting our priorities backwards, but >> there's clearly a spectrum in terms of how much people care about the >> cost of partial compiles, and I'm clearly all the way on one end of >> it. I don't like having to think hard about where a function >> prototype is or should be, and getting more consistency there would, >> for me, outweigh all other considerations. > > fmgr.h is a nasty header which would do well to avoid including in other > headers as much as possible; it makes compilation in frontend > environment impossible. For headers that don't otherwise need fmgr.h, > my preference is to keep the SQL-callable declarations in builtins.h or > some other dedicated header. Well, there's something to that argument. I can live with whatever you decide to do here, but given my druthers, the prototypes for src/backend/X/Y/Z.c would all be in src/include/X/Z.h. If that means shuffling some code around, I'd rather do that than have the prototypes in strange places. But if I get outvoted, oh well. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: