On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 6:18 AM Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
> Overall, I'm quite happy with these results. The question is, should
> this be back-patched?
>
> In the past, I think I've only back-patched numeric bug-fixes where
> the digits output by the old code were incorrect or an error was
> thrown, not changes that resulted in a different number of digits
> being output, changing the precision of already-correct results.
> However, having 10.0^(-18) produce zero seems pretty bad, so my
> inclination is to back-patch, unless anyone objects.
I don't think that back-patching is a very good idea. The bar for
changing query results should be super-high. Applications can depend
on the existing behavior even if it's wrong.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com