Re: 2016-01 Commitfest
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 2016-01 Commitfest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoaks7HL7RXcCOy-9+c3YuSbTriU9DmcOoFRhg05-SurFw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 2016-01 Commitfest (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 2016-01 Commitfest
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > We still have 41 patches that haven't gotten enough review though. The > bad part about it is that there's a number of patches that have been > bouncing for many commitfests now. Here's a list of the patches with > the most such actions (both in Needs Review and Ready for Committer > state): > > Five "Moved to next commitfest" > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/49/ > Default Roles This patch has gotten some feedback relatively recently, specifically to question whether we want it. I think it's fair to say that the reaction to this proposal has never been cold nor more than lukewarm. > Four "Moved to next commitfest" > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/129/ > Unique Joins I've been hoping Tom would pick this up. If he doesn't, I will look at it eventually, but it's not on my top 20 list of things to get committed at this point. I think it's worthwhile, but I just don't have the bandwidth. > Three "Moved to next commitfest" > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/169/ > postgres_fdw: Options to set fetch_size at the server and table level. Just reviewed that. > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/180/ > Atomic commit support for foreign data wrappers I think this needs considerably more work, but it probably needs a series of detailed reviews first. There's also some question about how this fits into the distributed transaction manager work by the Postgres Pro guys. > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/189/ > extends pgbench expressions with functions I looked at this in the past and felt that the design was not good. It's been revised since then, but I haven't gotten back around to look at it again. I think this has gotten a fair amount of discussion but I'm not sure we've converged on something really solid yet. > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/210/ > improving join estimates using FK This thread seems to end with some author-reviewer discussion that petered out. > * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/8/260/ > checkpoint continuous flushing Andres FTW. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: