Re: Transparent column encryption
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Transparent column encryption |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoakADEv1+i3aQ9A8er7uDnb_Ev9RRfb6E7zy64yTQW9+A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Transparent column encryption (Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:49 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres@jeltef.nl> wrote: > I think this is an interesting idea. I can indeed see use cases for > e.g. inserting a new row based on another row (where the secret is the > same). > > IMHO that means that we should also bump the protocol version for this > change, because it's changing the wire protocol by adding a new > parameter format code. And it does so in a way that does not depend on > the new protocol extension. I think we're more or less covering the same ground we did on the other thread here -- in theory I don't love the fact that we never bump the protocol version when we change stuff, but in practice if we start bumping it every time we do anything I think it's going to just break a bunch of stuff without any real benefit. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: