Re: [HACKERS] Time to drop old-style (V0) functions?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Time to drop old-style (V0) functions? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoagnrpbM2Pqke2tRs7RfU6chSe5+C_HLxfAROyaAxO=mg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Time to drop old-style (V0) functions? (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Time to drop old-style (V0) functions?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > I think a more efficient variant would make the function signature look > something like: > > Datum /* directly returned argument */ > pgfunc( > /* extra information about function call */ > FunctionCallInfo *fcinfo, > /* bitmap of NULL arguments */ > uint64_t nulls, > /* first argument */ > Datum arg0, > /* second argument */ > Datum arg1, > /* returned NULL */ > bool *isnull > ); Yeah, that's kind of nice. I like the uint64 for nulls, although FUNC_MAX_ARGS > 64 by default and certainly can be configured that way. It wouldn't be a problem for any common cases, of course. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: