Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoafKJc3p1jgYmqq-j1NuSb--ONfZi7o52ptv84gLYFSQw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Remaining 'needs review' patchs in July commitfest (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: >>>> plpgsql raise statement with context >>> Impasse. Everyone wants this feature in some form, but no consensus on >>> whether to do this client-side or server-side. > >> +1 for server-side. Does anyone other than you even think that the >> client side is a reasonable way to go? > > Yes. This is presupposing on the server side what the client will want > to display. Fair enough. I'm still not convinced we're doing anything other than complicating what ought to be a simple matter. It is just a fact that logging tracing messages in PL/pgsql functions is a pain in the butt right now in some situations because you get a huge number of CONTEXT lines that you don't want. Can we agree on some solution to that problem without over-engineering this to infinity? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: