Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoae8yoVAOVM7PGO5FhLMhN2LL3K3A0iz+4vWuZGWdFisA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation
Re: Avoiding repeated snapshot computation |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote: > On Saturday, November 26, 2011 09:52:17 PM Tom Lane wrote: >> I'd just as soon keep the fields in a logical order. > Btw, I don't think the new order is necessarily worse than the old one. You forget to attach the benchmark results. My impression is that cache lines on modern hardware are 64 or 128 *bytes*, in which case this wouldn't matter a bit. But testing is even better than guessing. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: