Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem)
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmoae-GpFiu5WS+xhUjBKv4CihBiwJRk8EwqvQ4gxDDC-cQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem) (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [v9.2] LEAKPROOF attribute of FUNCTION (Re: [v9.2] Fix
Leaky View Problem)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > I could not find out where is the origin of grammer conflicts, although > it does not conflict with any options within ALTER FUNCTION. > > Do you think the idea of ALTER ... NOT LEAKPROOF should be > integrated within v9.2 timeline also? Yes. Did you notice that I attached a patch to make that work? I'll commit that today or tomorrow unless someone comes up with a better solution. >> I also think we ought to stick create_function_3 into one of the >> parallel groups in the regression tests, if possible. Can you >> investigate that? >> > Not yet. This test does not have dependency with other tests, > so, I'm optimistic to run create_function_3 concurrently. Me, too. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: