Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoadsNdX5aPDCG2NOh5FBOFTTt5mW0opgDE7Bzx8AbEmow@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in -c CLI option of pg_dump/pg_restore
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Robert Haas escribió: >> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Guillaume Lelarge >> <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote: >> > Any comments on this? >> >> I'm not sure I'd want to back-patch this, since it is a behavior >> change, but I do think it's probably a good idea to change it for 9.3. > > Hm, but the bug is said to happen only in 9.2, so if we don't backpatch > we would leave 9.2 alone exhibiting this behavior. Oh, yeah. I missed that. But then shouldn't we start by identifying which commit broke it before we decide on a fix? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: