Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoadYJ2oN=Ur9qYynuGpkm9yYQHt95uCHFq39ah+j9pf6A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol) (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: [HACKERS] Passwordidentifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:30 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 5:42 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: >> * Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >>> On 12/15/16 8:40 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: >>> > I don't follow why we can't change the syntax for CREATE USER to allow >>> > specifying the verifier type independently. >>> >>> That's what the last patch set I looked at actually does. >> >> Well, same here, but it was quite a while ago and things have progressed >> since then wrt SCRAM, as I understand it... > > From the discussions of last year on -hackers, it was decided to *not* > have an additional column per complains from a couple of hackers > (Robert you were in this set at this point), ... Hmm, I don't recall taking that position, but then there are a lot of things that I ought to recall and don't. (Ask my wife!) -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: