Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+Tgmoabw8KW9rx6ThnUTR_ofJC8GwVaC+XMe7HkZvsG7J1rvA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc
Re: hyrax vs. RelationBuildPartitionDesc |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 12:42 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > I remember going over this code's memory allocation strategy a bit to > avoid the copy while not incurring potential leaks CacheMemoryContext; > as I recall, my idea was to use two contexts, one of which is temporary > and used for any potentially leaky callees, and destroyed at the end of > the function, and the other contains the good stuff and is reparented to > CacheMemoryContext at the end. So if you have any accidental leaks, > they don't affect a long-lived context. You have to be mindful of not > calling leaky code when you're using the permanent one. Well, that assumes that the functions which allocate the good stuff do not also leak, which seems a bit fragile. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: