Re: ENABLE/DISABLE CONSTRAINT NAME
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ENABLE/DISABLE CONSTRAINT NAME |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoabJW1D3+xxXkeqH43DKyqPzqk9V4bB0im8wRO09zroLg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ENABLE/DISABLE CONSTRAINT NAME (wangshuo@highgo.com.cn) |
Ответы |
Re: ENABLE/DISABLE CONSTRAINT NAME
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:03 PM, <wangshuo@highgo.com.cn> wrote: > Second, I tested the check and the foreign key constraint as your test > above. > And no error found, as fellow: You're missing the point. Peter wasn't worried that your patch throws an error; he's concerned about the fact that it doesn't. In PostgreSQL, you can only create the following view because test1 has a primary key over column a: => create table test1 (a int constraint pk primary key, b text); => create view test2 as select a, b from test1 group by a; => alter table test1 drop constraint pk; The reason that, if the primary key weren't there, it would be ambiguous which row should be returned as among multiple values where a is equal and b is not. If you can disable the constraint, then you can create precisely that problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: