Re: [HACKERS] Unused variable scanned_tuples in LVRelStats
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Unused variable scanned_tuples in LVRelStats |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaagZ17GmD_XOizrYT9d57x0G-R5RN-A4ES2gEpCs7Lhw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [HACKERS] Unused variable scanned_tuples in LVRelStats (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Unused variable scanned_tuples in LVRelStats
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote: > scanned_tuples variable in LVRelStats is introduced by commit b4b6923e > but it seems to me that it's actually not used. We store num_tuples > into vacrelstats->scanned_tuples after scanned all blocks, and the > comment mentioned that saving it in order to use later but we actually > use num_tuples instead of vacrelstats->scanned_tuples from there. I > think the since the name of scanned_tuples implies more clearer > purpose than num_tuples it's better to use it instead of num_tuples, > or we can remove scanned_tuples from LVRelStats. I think we should only store stuff in LVRelStats if it needs to be passed to some other function. Data that's only used in lazy_scan_heap() can just be kept in local variables. We could rename the local variable, though, since I agree with you that scanned_tuples is clearer. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: