Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaZPgyTfPBrJNu=D+6CQD69LnbEdhE8Xx1y0frMZDjooA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names? (Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov@google.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 10:29 AM, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov@google.com> wrote: > I've found myself wondering "where is my xlog" after running > pg_switch_xlog() in 10.0. > > Renaming pg_xlog to pg_wal created inconsistency between tools, function > names and directory name on disk. > > Should we also: > > - rename pg_switch_xlog and friends to pg_switch_wal? > - rename pg_recievexlog to pg_revievewal (and others in bin/)? > - rename pg_xlogdump to pg_waldump? I think yes to all. > - if we do rename, should we keep aliases for functions and symlinks for > tools? I think no. > - anything else? There are some SQL-callable functions that should probably be renamed to match, too. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: