Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaZ5kymbyyz=p9fkZKyWNH66QRNeNq_w82XzqYw+qArbA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partitiontable (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] reload-through-the-top-parent switch the partition table
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 8/2/17 13:58, Tom Lane wrote: >> I notice that the option list already includes some references to >> "insert", so maybe "--insert-via-partition-root"? Although you could >> argue that that's confusing when we're using COPY. > > "load" could be more general. But I'm also OK with "restore". "load" seems better than "restore" to me, both because it's shorter and because it sounds less like pg_dump will be doing the job of pg_restore. So maybe --load-via-partition-root if nobody likes my previous suggestion of --partition-data-via-root ? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: