Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaVQckAJ6GbRW4OOPV4oQm-NGW+EYt=VVyqVD9qTXi+LQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction (Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: PATCH: optimized DROP of multiple tables within a transaction
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> wrote: > I thought I followed the conding style - which guidelines have I broken? + /* If there are no non-local relations, then we're done. Release the memory + * and return. */ Multi-line comments should start with a line containing only /* and end with a line containing only */. +DropRelFileNodeAllBuffers(RelFileNodeBackend * rnodes, int nnodes) and +rnode_comparator(const void * p1, const void * p2) The extra spaces after the asterisks should be removed. +void smgrdounlinkall(SMgrRelation * rels, int nrels, bool isRedo) +{ void should be on a line by itself. Sorry to nitpick. As for BSEARCH_LIMIT, I don't have a great idea - maybe just DROP_RELATIONS_BSEARCH_LIMIT? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: