Re: open items for 9.4
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: open items for 9.4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaVOkgeiQYAbUHJ-Y_e1sD3XmF2h7V1vCkxSHnh+i15+g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: open items for 9.4 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> The items I see are: > >> - Remove xloginsert_slots/xloginsert_locks GUC - Not yet!! > >> The text seems to indicate that there's some disagreement on this >> point. I don't have a strong opinion on whether or not to keep the >> GUC, but if we're going to remove it it should probably happen before >> beta3. It's going to be impossible to remove once we've released with >> it, I suspect. > > The lack of any documentation for the GUC (neither in config.sgml or > postgresql.conf.sample) suggests very very strongly that it was not > meant to be shipped. If we don't remove it I will certainly insist > that it be documented adequately. > > Personally I think a hardwired #define should be plenty. What's the > argument that users will need to tune this at runtime? +1. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: