Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaUbPvKO66pBsThrijtGcVi5uo6OcfXQPFUyGs8vdmijA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Still not safe. Checksum collisions do happen, especially in big data sets. > > If you use an appropriate algorithm for appropriate amounts of data > that's not a relevant concern. You can easily do different checksums for > every 1GB segment of data. If you do it right the likelihood of > conflicts doing that is so low it doesn't matter at all. True, but if you use LSNs the likelihood is 0. Comparing the LSN is also most likely a heck of a lot faster than checksumming the entire page. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: