Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaTVZjKR_v0CoNbyhqZA3CJ4s3=-D6q3RbeXii_+he_hA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: MV patch broke users of ExplainOneQuery_hook
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >> The materialized views patch adjusted ExplainOneQuery to take an >> additional DestReceiver argument, but failed to add a matching >> argument to the definition of ExplainOneQuery_hook. This makes the >> hook unusable. The idea of this hook is that your hook function will >> do something before and/or after calling pg_plan_query and >> ExplainOnePlan. But this no longer works, because ExplainOnePlan >> needs the DestReceiver, which hasn't been exposed to the hook. :-( > > TBH I'd like to revert all of that anyway; it seemed to me to be > basically gratuitous breakage of an API used by plugins. I've not > had time to look at whether there was an actual reason for it and > if so how we might solve that differently. Oops. I just pushed a fix for the situation as it stands, but it's only 2 lines, so it shouldn't be too much trouble to revert it if we decide on a different approach. I do agree it would be nice not to need to change the API there. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: