Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaSdAqw3bM3iDCok5zu0ikQ7fbBqQkiQxx60sTQEhaaSw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c) (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Robert Haas >> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 1:26 PM >> To: Kaigai Kouhei(海外 浩平) >> Cc: Andres Freund; Amit Kapila; pgsql-hackers >> Subject: Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: [HACKERS] CustomScan support >> on readfuncs.c) >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 1:25 AM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: >> > It is pretty good! >> > >> > The attached patch (primary one) implements the above idea. >> > >> > Now ExtensibleNode works as a basis structure of data container, >> > regardless of CustomScan and ForeignScan. >> > Also, fdw_private and custom_private are de-defined to Node * type >> > from List * type. It affected to a few FDW APIs. >> >> I extracted the subset of this that just creates the extensible node >> framework and did some cleanup - the result is attached. I will >> commit this if nobody objects. >> > I have no objection of course. Done. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: