Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaQ9pwCZfdbvkZwhooNNAuaDJeQBmgmnDvrWbh1fHEPTw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks
Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks Re: [HACKERS] postgres_fdw super user checks |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 5:57 PM, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > I think the real behaviour can be described as something like this: > > "Only superusers may connect to foreign servers without password > authentication, so always specify the <literal>password</literal> > option for user mappings that may be used by non-superusers." But > which user mappings may be used by non-superusers can not be defined > without explaining views owned by superusers. I don't think we should > be talking about views in that part of documentation. Well, if we don't, then I'm not sure we can really make this clear. Anyhow, I've committed the patch to master for now; we can keep arguing about what, if anything, to do for back-branch documentation. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: