Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1)
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaPDHc3DezX1JsiHkEcoMcG69gV91eFf64ev77vR2TzVg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] add long options to pgbench (submission 1) (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:24 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr> wrote: >>>> I think --quiet-log should be spelled --quiet. >>> >>> ISTM that --quiet usually means "not verbose on stdout", so I added log >>> because this was specific to the log output, and that there may be a need >>> for a --quiet option for stdout at some time. >> >> The output that is quieted by -q is not the log output produced by >> --log; it's the regular progress output on stdout/stderr. >> >> So I changed that, and committed this, with some further cosmetic >> changes. I made the formatting of the help message more like psql's >> help message, including adjusting pgbench to start the description of >> each option in the same column that psql does. This got rid of a lot >> of line breaks and IMHO makes the output of pgbench --help quite a bit >> more readable. I made stylistic adjustments to the documentation >> portion of the patch as well, again to match the markup used for psql. > > In help messages: > > + " -s NUM, --scale NUM scaling factor\n" > > This should be "-s, --scale=NUM" for the sake of consistency with other > options. Woops, missed that one. Fixed, thanks. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: