Re: Hash Indexes
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Hash Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaP7re+50E8fvmzoNtihNgJ0A0jb6Hf3=NZ-UVM0uE8_w@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Hash Indexes (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Hash Indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:41 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it is possible without breaking pg_upgrade, if we match all > items of a page at once (and save them as local copy), rather than > matching item-by-item as we do now. We are already doing similar for > btree, refer explanation of BTScanPosItem and BTScanPosData in > nbtree.h. If ever we want to sort hash buckets by TID, it would be best to do that in v10 since we're presumably going to be recommending a REINDEX anyway. But is that a good thing to do? That's a little harder to say. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: