Re: backup manifests
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: backup manifests |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaKhxPr0FWsEiZoXpMER44pMJ28L-Z7wcRrOKoGFwjiUQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: backup manifests (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: backup manifests
Re: backup manifests Re: backup manifests Re: backup manifests |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 4:34 PM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote: > +1. These would be great tests to have and a win for pg_basebackup > overall but I don't think they should be a prerequisite for this commit. Not to mention the server. I can't say that I have a lot of confidence that all of the server behavior in this area is well-understood and sane. I've pushed all the patches. Hopefully everyone is happy now, or at least not so unhappy that they're going to break quarantine to beat me up. I hope I acknowledged all of the relevant people in the commit message, but it's possible that I missed somebody; if so, my apologies. As is my usual custom, I added entries in roughly the order that people chimed in on the thread, so the ordering should not be taken as a reflection of magnitude of contribution or, well, anything other than the approximate order in which they chimed in. It looks like the buildfarm is unhappy though, so I guess I'd better go look at that. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: