Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoaKP2g6oTiYvpqc64Bhxt_7ncbeYR3fNmg7h-4sVQwxMA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed (Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed
Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com> wrote: > The attached patch replaces this palloc0() by MemoryContextAllocHuge() + memset(). > Indeed, this hash table is constructed towards the relation with nrows=119994544, > so, it is not strange even if hash-slot itself is larger than 1GB. You forgot to attach the patch, I think. It looks to me like the size of a HashJoinTuple is going to be 16 bytes, so 1GB/16 = ~64 million. That's a lot of buckets, but maybe not unreasonably many if you've got enough memory. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: